The Dunwiddie Post

A record of storms survived and horizons still calling

Gresham’s Law of Sex

I. Shanghai

Shanghai is a city of commerce without apology.

Money is made, exchanged, counted and reinvested. The towers, banks, shopping streets and endless movement of goods carry the same message: this is a city that understands trade.

Walking through it, a principle from monetary history kept returning to me.

Gresham’s Law.

Bad money drives out good.

Under a gold standard, take two instruments, each denominated at one pound: a paper banknote and a gold sovereign. The sovereign contains the gold. The banknote promises its equivalent. The denomination is the same. The backing may not be.

When both must be accepted at the same nominal value, the doubtful banknote is spent and the sovereign retained. The paper circulates. The gold goes into reserve. Its owner understands the difference between a pound printed on a promise and a pound settled in gold.

Shanghai gives that distinction physical form. Paper claims move across screens while gold is weighed, tested, bought and stored. One can be created by extending a balance sheet. The other must be acquired.

A boy was born in 1971, the year the United States closed the gold window. The dollar’s remaining convertibility into gold was suspended. The suspension was called temporary. It became the new order.

That boy later entered the relationship market believing men and women still exchanged hard currencies. Restraint and exclusivity would meet loyalty and commitment. He would build his reserves. The woman would preserve hers. Both would bring something scarce to the settlement.

He had little capital and little success. He worked, built a career, accumulated money, bought a house and established a company. Female interest increased. He thought his personality had finally been recognised.

His personality had not suddenly appeared. What had changed was the backing.

He had become hard currency.

Meanwhile, women had been issuing another currency. Sexual access circulated without the commitment he was still accumulating the means to provide. Other men received it on terms that were never offered to him.

He had remained on the old standard while the new currency circulated elsewhere.

One market. Two instruments. Different exchange rates.

II. Hard Currency

The inherited bargain rested on reciprocal scarcity.

But the starting balance sheets were different.

The man began with an empty vault. The woman began with the gold already in hers.

His task was accumulation. Hers was preservation.

The female currency was femininity, purity, sexual restraint, selectivity and exclusivity. The male currency was courtship, loyalty, provision and permanence. He had to build the value he would eventually offer. She had to preserve the value with which she entered the market. The bargain joined acquired reserves to preserved reserves.

The male side takes years to build.

Competence requires practice. Capital requires earnings, restraint and accumulation. Stability requires decisions repeated long after their novelty has disappeared. A reputation for reliability requires a record. The house, the savings and the capacity to provide represent life already expended.

Commitment then adds a claim on life still to come.

A man who commits allocates future time, income, attention and optionality. He accepts obligations that may outlast the attraction which brought him into the arrangement. His offer is backed by both accumulated reserves and future production.

That currency is expensive to manufacture.

It does not become cheap because someone else wants it. Nor does a man become obliged to release it merely because he has succeeded in accumulating it.

The female reserve was the scarcity and selectivity attached to sexual access. It was not manufactured through years of earnings. It was present at the beginning, and its preservation determined what remained available for the eventual settlement.

Cheap issuance did not add gold to that vault. It spent the scarcity which had given the original promise its value. More paper could circulate while less backing remained behind the denomination.

The old bargain made sense while both vaults could support the exchange. Being chosen for an exclusive settlement meant something when access had not already circulated on easier terms.

The sexual revolution altered that relationship.

It did not immediately abolish the old denomination. It introduced a cheaper instrument beside it, then continued asking for settlement at the old price.

III. The Second Currency

The new currency allowed paper claims to multiply without a corresponding increase in reserves.

Traditional courtship had pillars: family, church, community, reputation and ceremony. Those institutions imposed friction, kept records and made issuance visible. Modern dating demolished the temple and handed every woman a private printing press. Circulation became opaque. Reserves could not be audited. The ledger became self-reported. Yet every note still arrived marked scarce, exclusive and premium-grade. Every dating profile might as well have stood between two Corinthian columns with an issuing clerk behind the desk.

Hookups, casual sex and situationships allowed it to circulate without courtship, exclusivity or a credible future. Contraception and abortion weakened the connection between sex and childbirth. Feminism reduced the reputational cost.

Digital platforms widened the market. Anonymous foreign holidays removed the local ledger: no shared social circle, no lasting reputation and a departure date built into the transaction. A woman could issue freely abroad, return to the man whose commitment remained in place and seal the foreign episode inside a separate compartment. He continued pricing the relationship without knowing a second ledger even existed.

What had required a substantial commitment could be issued for immediate desire.

But increased supply did not mean equal access.

Desire selected its recipients. Highly desired men could obtain the new currency without supplying the old backing. They did not need to offer a house, provision, patient courtship or marriage to receive what other men were still being told to earn.

Men outside that flow continued accumulating. They worked, established themselves and prepared for a relationship market whose advertised terms still required serious commitment.

They encountered scarcity while supply expanded elsewhere.

This was the central asymmetry. The same market could be liquid for one class of men and expensive for another. The men receiving cheap issuance had little reason to buy the old bundle. The men expected to buy the old bundle had often received little of the cheap issuance.

They were not the beneficiaries of the inflation.

They became its later counterparties.

The two instruments circulated inside the same market, while feminism insisted that the exchange rate had never changed.

IV. The Hidden Ledger

Choosing a bank requires more than admiring its frontage.

The building may look solid. Its name may inspire confidence. The banknote may carry a handsome promise to pay one pound. None of that establishes how much gold remains in the vault or how many paper claims have been issued against it.

The question is not whether the note looks respectable. It is whether the bank can support the settlement it promises.

The same examination belongs in the relationship market. A man who has spent years filling his own vault needs to know whether the institution offering him a note has preserved its reserves, or merely continued printing against an old reputation for solidity.

Every bank has an issuance history.

A printed denomination does not establish backing. Nor does the declaration of present exclusivity erase the terms on which access was previously offered.

The ledger contains more than a number. It records selectivity, volume, recipients and price. Who received access? What did they contribute? How readily was it offered? What is now being demanded from the man approached for permanence?

Extensive prior sexual availability reduces a woman’s long-term relationship value in the male market. The proposition is worth less because the scarcity and selectivity men value have already been reduced. Calling the history irrelevant does not restore them.

Volume matters. Terms matter. Exchange rates matter.

A man who received access through desire alone and a man later asked for resources, legal commitment and years of loyalty were offered different prices. The later offer cannot be valued honestly by looking only at its label.

Present exclusivity is part of the offer. Its history is part of the valuation.

Concealment adds duplicity, but concealment does not create the dilution. The issuance has already occurred. Hiding the ledger merely prevents the next counterparty from pricing it accurately.

Nor does a higher asking price establish a higher value. A demand for permanence can reveal what the issuer now wants without demonstrating what the buyer will receive.

The banknote says one pound.

The vault determines what that promise is worth.

V. Slagflation

The expansion of sexual currency created a powerful arbitrage.

A woman could issue cheaply to men selected for immediate desire, then seek a permanent settlement from another man in the old denomination: courtship, resources, protection, loyalty and marriage.

One market supplied excitement. The other supplied backing. The advantage lay in taking the benefits of both while denying that the first transaction changed the value of the second.

This was slagflation.

The consequence had been delayed, not abolished. Issuance and settlement had simply been separated by a decade or more.

The new currency expanded while the advertised cost of male commitment remained high. Sexual access became easier to issue. The years required to build a solvent, competent and reliable man did not become easier to compress.

Women watched other women, learned what could be obtained and what could be withheld, and adjusted their behaviour. What began as an advantage became a convention. The market taught its participants how the market was played.

An individual strategy became a market norm. The norm then justified the strategy. Feminist doctrine declared female issuance private and irrelevant while leaving male resources, intentions and future commitment open to inspection, negotiation and judgment.

The asymmetry entered the accounting itself. One ledger was examinable. The other was supposed to be accepted unopened.

For a considerable period, the trade cleared.

Men continued accumulating against the inherited bargain. They assumed that the currency offered to them had been preserved under a discipline resembling their own. Their assets were real. Their understanding of the exchange rate was obsolete.

The asset had not been scarce in the way they had believed. The earlier price had been low. The later price was high. A generation of men had kept accumulating against terms that no longer existed.

Women had circulated paper and requested settlement in gold.

The arbitrage depended on the later man accepting the denomination without examining the issuance. Once he compared the two, the difference could no longer be hidden inside the language of commitment.

VI. The Repricing

No arbitrage survives discovery forever.

Men began comparing exchange rates. They distinguished being desired from being selected to provide. They noticed when substantial obligations were being demanded for an offer previously made without them.

The relevant question became what the transaction was actually worth.

Why release years of accumulated capital and a claim on future life at the historic price when the reciprocal scarcity had already been diluted?

Repricing followed.

Some men offered less courtship, less provision and less commitment. Others extended the audit, watching behaviour before releasing reserves. Some accepted casual terms while refusing permanent liabilities. Others stopped trading.

The different responses had the same underlying effect: hard currency became harder to obtain.

This is the Gresham effect within the relationship model. Feminist orthodoxy continued treating the one-pound banknote and the one-pound sovereign as though matching denominations guaranteed equal backing. Men who recognised the difference began retaining their gold rather than exchanging it for paper of uncertain redemption value.

Their competence had not disappeared. Their capital had not vanished. Their capacity for loyalty had not ceased to exist. Those reserves were simply being withheld from transactions which failed to justify their release.

Once men withheld their half, the old reciprocal bargain could no longer circulate on demand.

Women called this male commitment phobia.

The market has no commitment phobia. It has a bid.

This was a valuation crisis.

The asking price remained high because women still wanted the old benefits. The bid fell because the buyer no longer accepted the old valuation. Calling him reluctant, immature or afraid of commitment did not close the spread.

Nor could additional accumulation solve it. A larger reserve does not improve the terms of a bad exchange. It merely gives the holder more to surrender.

The good money withdrew because its owners could finally see what they were being asked to buy.

VII. Into Reserve

Shanghai understands the distinction.

Paper moves quickly. Credit expands. Numbers multiply across screens. Physical gold remains something that must be weighed, tested, acquired and settled.

Its absence from ordinary circulation does not mean it has lost its value. It means its holders understand its value and refuse the offered exchange rate.

The same logic applies to accumulated male capital.

A man who has built resources, competence, stability and the capacity to commit holds assets with uses beyond the relationship market. They can finance movement, experience, independence and a life already worth living. Their value does not depend on surrendering them to someone else’s preferred settlement.

Commitment is available when the return justifies the allocation. Its mere availability creates no claim upon it.

The holder reads the ledger. He examines the issuing bank, its reserves and its history. He distinguishes a well-backed promise from a demand that his own gold should make good someone else’s paper.

When the exchange rate is false, he retains his gold.

Bad money has driven out good.

Bringing it back into circulation will require a serious repricing.

Inspecting the Colonies: Shanghai

Last year, in Malaysia, a Chinese fortune teller informed me with the calm certainty of a man announcing tomorrow’s weather that a visit to China formed an essential part of my future.

Prophecy is generally improved by practical assistance. In 2026, a direct flight began operating from Dublin to Shanghai. Soon afterwards, I discovered that British visitors no longer required a visa for a stay of up to thirty days. Fate, aviation and Chinese immigration policy had reached an unusual degree of agreement.

It would have been almost superstitious not to go.

And so I flew to Shanghai to inspect the colony.

There was, officially, no British colony of Shanghai. This is one of those statements which is accurate without being especially informative. The British merely secured a concession, dominated a great part of the trade, erected banks and clubs of imperial confidence, raced horses and conducted themselves for the better part of a century as though the distinction were a technical one.

The terminology was delicate. The masonry was not.

Along the Bund stand the great commercial temples of the old order. None is grander than the former headquarters of the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation: a building constructed with the confidence of men who expected their accounts to outlive governments. Around it, the riverfront still carries the weight of the trade which made Shanghai one of the great cities of the world.

Then there was the Shanghai Race Club. What could be more British than arriving in a foreign city and deciding that what it chiefly required was horse racing?

The racecourse has gone. Its great oval became People’s Square and People’s Park, while the surviving clubhouse now contains the Shanghai History Museum. The horses will trot no more. Yet inside the old building there remains a First World War memorial to twenty-eight members of the Race Club who left Shanghai to fight and did not return.

Revolution had cleared the course, changed the name and filled the grounds with the people. It had not quite managed to remove the dead.

The high number of officers suggests the class

The French maintained their own concession and left behind something rather different. It is still one of the loveliest parts of Shanghai in which to walk: long avenues, old houses, guarded gardens and buildings which retain the privacy of another age. The French architecture does not announce itself with the weight of the Bund. It hides behind walls and trees and waits to be discovered.

But the European remains are not confined to the recognised historic quarters. A random walk may suddenly produce an English Victorian building, an Art Deco villa or a piece of 1930s mock Tudor which would not look entirely out of place in a suburban street in England. Shanghai contains architectural encounters which seem implausible until one is standing in front of them.

British Victorian, Shanghai

These houses carry their lost stories silently. It is easy to imagine a European family living comfortably in an Art Deco house in the early 1930s, believing that the arrangements of life were permanent. Then came the Japanese attacks, the great battle of 1937, the isolation of the foreign settlements and finally their occupation in 1941. Many foreigners fled. Others were later interned. A house which had represented confidence and continuity became a witness to how quickly both could disappear.

The buildings survived their owners. Buildings often do.

Shanghai, however, is no museum. It is alive, immense and commercially ravenous. It may yet become the financial capital of the world. It already possesses the world’s largest purely physical spot gold exchange, a distinction which naturally interested me rather more than another avenue of designer shops.

The colonial merchants would have understood the modern city perfectly. The flags have changed, the language of government has changed and the scale has become almost unimaginable. The appetite for trade remains.

Shanghai has also produced what might be called Shallowhai.

This is the Shanghai of conspicuous wealth, where possession seems incomplete until it has been placed before an audience. Perhaps this is inevitable in a country where large private fortunes are still comparatively young, and in a city built upon finance and trade. Whatever the explanation, Shanghai is filled with malls, luxury brands and immense modern temples to Huawei, Apple and Samsung. I had never seen mobile telephone shops on such a scale. They possessed the lighting, proportions and solemnity once reserved for banks and churches.

One afternoon, a man drove past me in a pink open-top Bentley with music announcing his arrival several streets in advance. He may have intended to project success. Unfortunately, he reminded me chiefly of Mr Chow in The Hangover.

The mobile telephone governs the streets. People navigate with it, pay with it, order with it, photograph themselves with it and occasionally appear to experience the physical world only after it has been converted into an image on the screen. Even by European standards, the level of absorption is extraordinary.

Some of the younger women dress as anime characters or in elaborate mutations of Victorian costume. The empire has vanished, but Victorian dress has returned in China as a fashion accessory, photographed on a Chinese telephone and uploaded through a Chinese network. History does not always come back in the form expected.

Then there is Scamhai.

On my first day, nobody hassled me. I concluded that Shanghai was a remarkably safe and orderly city. Shanghai allowed me twenty-four hours to enjoy this conclusion.

The following day, I walked towards the Bund through rain of monsoon proportions, carrying a large umbrella borrowed from the hotel. The streets were unusually quiet. There were few pedestrians and consequently very few available targets.

I was approached constantly.

During that walk I was offered an extensive catalogue of goods, services and activities, the details of which need not detain us. Several approaches ended when I told the person to leave before discovering what was being proposed. Persistence appears to increase in inverse proportion to the number of alternative victims in sight. On a crowded day, I might have passed unnoticed. In an empty street beneath a hotel umbrella, I had evidently become the market.

There was also a restaurant where I strongly suspected that a menu carrying higher European prices had appeared for my benefit. I could not prove it. I could observe that the prices bore little relation to what food had cost elsewhere. I left them to their enterprise having paid a toll and abandoned further restaurant experimentation in this city.

Scamhai is not a separate city. It inhabits the same commercial instinct as the banks and boutiques, operating at the scale of the lone foreigner. Wherever money, strangers and appetite gather in sufficient concentration, somebody establishes a secondary market in the inattentive.

The visit lasted longer than intended. It was a national holiday week, trains were difficult to obtain and Shanghai became, for several additional days, less a destination than a position from which I was temporarily unable to advance.

There are cities which improve with enforced intimacy. Shanghai is better taken at speed. Its scale is exhilarating, its surviving history remarkable and its human theatre inexhaustible, but after a time the malls repeat themselves, the telephone screens glow with the same blue light and even imperial architecture ceases to surprise.

Eventually a seat became available. At Hongqiao Station, the long white bullet train waited to carry me 1,329 kilometres north to Qingdao.

The queue for coaches 9-16 of my train. Similar queue the other side for coach 1-8, me

The horses would trot no more. Shanghai now had faster animals.

Inspecting the Colonies

Continuing my inspection of the colonies, over the past month I have visited two of the great walled plantation settlements of Protestant Ireland: Bandon in County Cork and Londonderry in County Derry.

They were built in the same century and for broadly the same purpose. Today, however, they present their history very differently.

Bandon

I went to Bandon with specific intent to walk the line of the old city walls.

Unfortunately, I was about 350 years too late.

Most of Bandon’s fortifications were dismantled following the Siege of Bandon in 1689. The official guided walk was nevertheless interesting because it showed where the walls had once stood and pointed out the fragments that remain. Parts have been incorporated into later buildings and boundaries, and the old line can still be followed through the town.

There is something I like about history surviving in this way. Not reconstructed and presented behind glass, but sitting awkwardly inside the modern town.

Bandon itself surprised me. Much of the centre has the solid appearance of an early nineteenth-century market town, with numerous buildings dating from around the 1840s and earlier. In places it reminded me of Alnwick in Northumberland.

The Protestant inheritance is also difficult to miss. Churches remain scattered through a town deliberately established as a Protestant settlement in Catholic Munster.

By good fortune, I was allowed up into one of the church bell towers and even got to ring one of the bells.

There are worse ways of announcing the arrival of an Englishman inspecting the colonies.

Another thing Bandon has lost entirely is its railway.

For a town of its history and size, that seems a considerable act of neglect. The railway once connected Bandon directly with Cork and continued west into the country beyond. Today the tracks are gone and the journey from Cork has to be completed by road.

In this respect, the colony has not been particularly well looked after.

First they took down the walls. Then they took away the railway.

Bandon also brought me unexpectedly close to another piece of history I have been following: the Allman family and their whiskey distillery.

Allman’s had been a huge exporter of Irish whiskey to the United States, only to become another victim of the economic crash of the 1930s.

The family story produced something rather less predictable than whiskey. A Catholic former servant married the considerably older Protestant Allman in 1925, despite an age difference of around thirty years. They had a child the following year and subsequently spent several years in France.

Catholic and Protestant. Servant and employer. A thirty-year age difference.

There is a story in there somewhere.

Londonderry

I contrasted Bandon by taking the train north from Dublin on the well-travelled route to Belfast, before continuing on to Portrush and Londonderry.

It was only when I visited Londonderry that I finally understood why it is called Londonderry.

The city was founded by the Corporation of London as part of the Plantation of Ulster. London was not simply added to the name as some later political affectation. The connection was there from the beginning.

London created Londonderry.

That led me to another interesting thought.

The City of London itself has always occupied a peculiar position within the United Kingdom. It has its own ancient corporation, its own privileges and its own traditions. Even the monarch has traditionally had to seek permission to enter the City.

So if London is itself effectively a city-state within a country, and Londonderry was created by London, perhaps Londonderry is itself an independent city-state within Northern Ireland.

An English colony inside an English colony.

I rather like that idea.

There was another striking contrast with Bandon.

In Bandon I had walked around looking for walls that were mostly no longer there. The line of the old fortifications could still be traced and fragments survived inside later buildings, but I had arrived about 350 years too late to see the town as it had once been.

Londonderry was different.

Here the walls survived.

Unlike Bandon, Londonderry was successfully defended during the Siege of 1689. The walls did what walls were supposed to do.

They kept the attackers out.

And more than three centuries later, I could still climb onto them and walk around the old Protestant plantation city.

From the walls I could look down over the Bogside, across the old city and out towards the surrounding country. The geography suddenly made sense in a way that it never could from reading about it.

By chance, I also discovered a second-hand bookshop immediately beside the walls and came away with another James Bond book.

This seemed entirely appropriate.

An Englishman buying a book about an agent of the Crown while inspecting the colonies.

Sometimes a journey provides its own jokes.

Bandon had left me following the ghost of a wall.

In Londonderry, I walked on it.

As I walked around the walls, I found myself thinking about several of the coins I have recovered while metal detecting, including a Charles II penny dated 1681.

It is a small, battered piece of copper, but somebody once carried it as money. Somebody lost it. And while it was still circulating, the events that would shape places such as Londonderry were unfolding around them.

I wonder what the original owner of that penny thought of the news arriving from elsewhere in Ireland.

What rumours had reached them? What did they know? Which side did they believe? Did any of it seem particularly important at the time?

We now compress the seventeenth century into kings, sieges, rebellions and dates.

The person who dropped my penny did not have that luxury.

They were simply living through it.

More than three centuries later, I picked up their coin from the sand.

And then I walked the walls.

The Journey Home

The journey home took four trains and a bus.

I had the option of waiting two hours for the direct train home, but decided against it. In retrospect, I almost wish I had waited, if only to complete the sequence properly.

The Enterprise from Belfast was something else.

By three in the afternoon, half the carriage seemed to have cans in hand. It had the atmosphere of a travelling pub.

At one point, a disagreement over seating directly opposite me came close to becoming an altercation. One man was from Belfast. The other was from Dundalk.

I suppose some border disputes are not fully resolved even now.

I liked it.

Real life. Real people. Real history still alive in the genes.

After Bandon and Londonderry, perhaps that was the right way to finish it. Not in a museum. Not with a plaque. Not with somebody explaining what Ireland had once been.

On a train, with two men arguing across the old frontier.

Now, what colony to inspect next?

Once

Glen Hansard died in a motorcycle crash in Dublin in the early hours of Wednesday, 29 July 2026.

I saw the news almost as soon as it appeared. I happened to be awake during the night, and somehow the internet knew this would matter to me.

For me, Glen Hansard will always be the busker from Once, one of my favourite films.

It is the kind of love story that could only have been made in Ireland. There is no kiss. There is no sex scene. In the conventional sense, there is no romance at all.

Yet the whole film is a romance.

Two people meet, recognise something in one another and develop a profound admiration. They make beautiful music together, quite literally. Then they separate and return to the lives already waiting for them.

They never become a couple. The music is what happens instead.

Once struck a chord with me long before I came to Ireland. Since moving here, the film has acquired a geography.

I have stood on Grafton Street and looked towards the place where Hansard busked in the film—and where he had busked in real life long before it. I have been to Dalkey and Killiney Hill, where Guy and Girl look out across the coast and she tells him in Czech that she loves him, knowing he cannot understand.

It is the nearest the film comes to a declaration.

I have often wondered why some enterprising Dublin busker does not claim that stretch of Grafton Street and play the songs from Once on rotation. A man with the right voice and guitar could probably make a small fortune. I cannot be the only person who has walked down that street partly because of this film.

Glen Hansard is gone.

Once remains.

I think I will watch it again.

Room 115 and the Road West

There are trips where you visit history.

Then there are trips where history starts arranging itself around you.

Staying in Cork, in Room 115 at the Imperial Hotel: the Michael Collins Suite. It sounds almost too neat, as if someone had written the itinerary after watching the film.

The Imperial is not just another old hotel with a plaque and a story. It sits in the heart of Cork, close to the streets that burned in 1920, close to the world Collins moved through, close enough that the whole period stops feeling like a chapter in a book and starts feeling like a physical place.

That is the strange power of staying in a historical room.

You do not simply think about Michael Collins.

You imagine him arriving.

You imagine the conversations that took place in the space you are sitting and sleeping.

You imagine the footsteps in corridors, the meetings behind closed doors, the pressure of being hunted, admired, used, opposed, and needed, all at once.

Was there anything spiritual there?

Yes.

Or at least something close to that. A sixth sense. A pressure in the room. A sense that the place had stored more than furniture, wallpaper, and hotel stories.

Was it Collins?

We do not know.

That is the only honest answer.

Maybe it was the room. Maybe it was Cork. Maybe it was the fact of knowing who had been there and what followed. Maybe it was the city itself, with its layers of rebellion, fire, empire, commerce, and memory pressed tightly together in a few streets.

But there was something.

Two nights mattered.

One night would have made the Imperial a curiosity. Two nights made it a base. Time to walk Cork, look around properly, take in the streets, the river, the old commercial city, the rebuilt city, the Cork that survived and the Cork that had to be made again.

Then began the drive west.

Not as a solemn pilgrimage. Not as a checklist.

Through the country roads slowly towards Macroom, then back down towards Bandon.

That was enough.

The story arrived through bends, fields, hedges, old houses, railway ghosts, small roads, and the slow pull of West Cork.

In Bandon, the Munster and a snack. Just like Collins himself that fateful day.

That mattered too.

History is not only plaques and monuments. It is also food, weather, roads, rooms, jokes, dogs, conversations, and half-formed thoughts.

There was no stop at Béal na Bláth.

By then, the road had already done enough.

The known story is simple.

Collins travels through Cork during the Civil War. His convoy is ambushed. He stops. There is firing. He is hit. He dies.

But driving that country does not make the story feel simple.

It makes it stranger.

Why that route?

Why that level of exposure?

Why stop and fight?

Why did a man whose whole reputation had been built on intelligence, secrecy, movement, and avoiding predictable patterns end his life exposed on a road in his own county?

And why does history so often give us the same image?

A powerful man.

A public route.

An open-topped car.

Gunfire.

Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo.

John F. Kennedy in Dallas.

Michael Collins in Cork.

Different men. Different countries. Different causes. Yet the shape repeats.

It proves nothing.

But it catches.

There is something almost theatrical about the open car. It turns status into exposure. It makes a man visible from a distance. It says: here he is. Watch him pass.

Maybe that was just how things were done.

Maybe security was primitive.

Maybe Collins trusted Cork too much.

Maybe he thought former comrades would not kill him.

Maybe the route was ordinary and only became strange because of the ending.

Maybe.

But the details remain.

The open car.

The road.

The decision to stop.

The low casualty count.

The political consequences.

The man who survived the British intelligence war did not survive a road in West Cork.

None of this gives certainty.

That is not the point.

The point is attention.

History smooths itself after the event. The rough edges get planed down. The narrative becomes clean. The questions become impolite. The dead become statues, then lessons, then slogans.

But the ground resists that.

Room 115 made Collins human.

Cork made the struggle physical.

The slow road west made the ending unresolved.

Bandon placed the story back inside ordinary Ireland: a town, a hotel, a snack, the road continuing beyond.

No need to stand at the memorial.

The trail was already there.

Sometimes history is not found by arriving at the final place. Sometimes it is found by moving through the country slowly enough for the questions to rise.

And sometimes the most honest sentence is not:

“This is what happened.”

It is:

“Look at this carefully.”

AI is Indeed a wonderful thing….

The Hidden Tourist Tax

I went back to Tunisia to test a memory.

I had worked in Tunis in 2010, and the city had stayed with me. Not just as a place, but as an energy: French and Italian bones, Arab life, Mediterranean confidence, cafés, traffic, white façades, old streets, movement, beauty, possibility.

Some cities vanish when you leave them.

Tunis had remained.

So I returned to ask a simple question.

Was it still there?

The answer was yes.

Not exactly as I remembered it. No city waits sixteen years to confirm a private myth. But the charge was still there. Tunis still had that layered, urban, slightly theatrical quality I had carried with me since 2010. It still felt alive in more than one direction at once.

That is Tunisia’s strength.

It is not one thing.

It is Punic, Roman, Arab, Ottoman, French, Italian, African, Mediterranean and modern Tunisian, all folded into the same landscape. Not cleanly. Not politely. But visibly. You can walk a few streets and feel one civilisation’s confidence turn into another civilisation’s afterlife.

That was what I came for.

I wanted Roman stones, sea air, cafés, railway stations, louages, whitewashed towns, old streets, medinas, fragments of empire, and the ordinary theatre of North African life.

I found all of it.

The old French and Italian city of Tunis was, unsurprisingly, one of the strongest parts of the trip. I loved it back in 2010. After all, it is recent history, only being vacated in 1956 by fleeing French, Italian, Greek and Jewish families with their stories of loss blown away by the winds of time. It is not polished heritage. It is better than that. It is a surviving layer. Art Nouveau, Art Deco, occasional 1950s modernist. Balconies, churches, façades, cafés, apartment blocks, commercial buildings, shaded streets, traces of a European Mediterranean world that once assumed it had a future there.

People had lived in those buildings as themselves.

They worked, prayed, argued, made money, lost money, loved, aged, raised children, and imagined that their world would continue.

Then history moved.

The buildings remained.

That is the power of Tunis. It does not give you history as a museum sequence. It gives you layers under your feet.

The cathedrals made the same point in stone.

Nobody builds a cathedral for a temporary mood. A cathedral is confidence made physical. Religious confidence, civic confidence, imperial confidence, cultural confidence. It says: we are here, and our world has weight.

And yet there they stand now in a changed Tunisia, no longer central, no longer commanding the same world that built them.

Evidence.

Not decoration.

The strongest refuge was the Protestant church and cemetery garden.

Outside: traffic, heat, call-outs, movement, negotiation, the small frictions of the street.

Inside: shade, stone, graves, names, flowers, silence.

There were British graves, as expected. But there were also Danish and Swedish names, and those struck deeper because of my years in Denmark. A Scandinavian name in a cemetery garden in Tunis is a small thing, but small things often carry the most human weight.

People had come south. They had traded, served, married, fallen ill, died, and been buried far from the cold north.

That garden was not an attraction.

It was a pause in history where nobody wanted anything from me.

And that mattered.

Because Tunisia also taught me the hidden tourist tax.

Not money.

Attention.

The low-level street approaches were not dramatic. This was not danger. It was not a siege. It was usually small: “Where are you from?” “My friend.” “Taxi?” “Restaurant?” “Guide?” “Come, come.”

The first time, you answer.

The second time, you recognise the shape.

After that, you know the script before it has properly begun.

The cost is not the dinars.

The cost is the interruption.

You are walking. Looking. Thinking. Building a map of the place. Comparing Tunis now with Tunis in 2010. Noticing a façade, a street angle, a church door, a café, a railway board, a piece of colonial geometry under modern traffic.

Then someone inserts himself into your attention.

Now you must classify him.

Friendly? Commercial? Taxi? Guide? Scam? Harmless? Persistent? Do I answer? Ignore? Refuse? Walk faster?

It takes two seconds.

But the thread breaks.

That is the tax.

A tax on solitude.

A tax on observation.

A tax on the direct experience of a place.

So the rule is simple.

No drama. No lecture. No anger.

“No, merci.”

“La, merci.”

Keep walking.

Attention preserved.

Trip restored.

Because the best of Tunisia deserved attention.

El Jem deserved it.

At the top of that amphitheatre, looking down into the arena and out across the ordinary town around it, Tunisia became enormous. Not peripheral. Not minor. Not some footnote to Rome. This land was rich: grain, olive oil, cities, ports, villas, baths, theatres, roads, amphitheatres.

The Roman map of North Africa is crowded with lost significance.

El Jem makes modern arrogance look temporary.

The stones do not perform. They do not sell. They do not ask where you are from. They simply stand there, long after the world that built them has disappeared.

That is real travel.

The sudden perception of depth.

Mahdia deserved attention too.

Sea, walls, old stones, light, space. It did not need to shout. Some places work because they allow the mind to settle. Mahdia had that. It gave the trip a coastal shape that was better than the original plan.

My route changed because Tunisia corrected it.

The first idea had been more ambitious: Tunis, Monastir, Sfax, Gabès, maybe further south.

But travel is not a spreadsheet.

A route can be logical and still wrong.

The better trip became Tunis, Sousse, Mahdia, El Jem, Sidi Bou Said.

Less heroic.

More coherent.

More historical.

More coastal.

Closer to what I actually value.

That is a useful rule.

Do not defend the itinerary against the country.

Let the place speak.

Tunisia spoke in fragments.

A railway board photographed because the internet could not be trusted.

A taxi price descending in stages.

A restaurant bill corrected when challenged.

A host message turning a zero-review hotel from possible phantom into real arrangement.

Old European streets in Tunis carrying the outline of a vanished world.

Cathedrals proving that confident communities become historical layers.

A Protestant cemetery garden where Danish and Swedish names lay quietly beneath North African light.

El Jem rising out of ordinary life like a warning from antiquity.

Mahdia giving the trip sea air and stillness.

Sidi Bou Said doing what it always does: white, blue, bright, theatrical, beautiful, over-known and still somehow effective.

This is why Tunisia stayed interesting.

Not because every moment was easy.

Because the country has depth.

It rewards attention.

And that became the lesson.

The real currency of travel is not money. Money matters, but it is not the core. The real currency is attention.

Spend it badly and even a cheap country becomes expensive.

Spend it well and a simple day becomes memorable.

A quiet coffee can outlive a famous sight.

A churchyard can restore more than a bar.

A walk by the sea can beat a guided tour.

A ruin at the right hour can outweigh five guidebook obligations.

The travel industry sells flights, beds, meals, transfers and experiences.

But the traveller is really buying conditions for attention.

A good hotel gives rest.

A good café gives a place to observe.

A good walk lets the mind stretch.

A good ruin gives attention somewhere worthy to land.

A good conversation expands the day instead of hijacking it.

A good destination gives your attention back in better condition than it found it.

Tunisia did that.

The street interruptions were noise. Irritating, yes. Revealing, yes. But still noise.

The country itself was not the noise.

The country was the old city of Tunis.

The cathedrals.

The cemetery garden.

The Roman stones.

The sea at Mahdia.

The amphitheatre at El Jem.

The medina walls.

The railway stations.

The cafés.

The energy I remembered from 2010, still alive enough to justify the return.

That was the signal.

Everything else was a tax.

Pay as little as possible.

Keep walking.

Look properly.

Tara and Bective

The Hill of Tara had been waiting for me since last year.

I had read about the Lia Fáil, the Stone of Destiny, said to cry out beneath the true king of Ireland. Some places are sights. Others are summons.

Tara was a summons.

We drove there through Meath, through low green country that felt older than the official story. Four thousand years is the number usually given, but the ground seemed deeper than that. I had felt the same at Baltinglass, where the neglected remnants of a bygone age seemed too large for the explanation placed around them.

I touched the Stone of Destiny.

No sky opened.

No thunder crossed Meath.

No voice named me ruler of Ireland.

A pity. Ireland could use help now. Not from Brussels, policy, or another consent-manufacturing committee. Something older would be required. Something beneath process. Something that remembered what a people is.

Perhaps no king was there.

Perhaps the stone has learned discretion.

Odysseus did not announce himself at every shore.

The church stood nearby, turned into a visitor centre. I did not go inside. There was an entry fee, and the stained-glass windows had been completely removed. That was enough. A sacred building emptied of meaning does not become more sacred because someone charges admission.

The churchyard was better.

Fewer people went there. That is usually a sign. It felt older than the church placed over it. A Bronze Age enclosure perhaps. There were quiet stones there, unexplained and overlooked. One of them could have been the real Stone of Destiny.

That is not a claim.

It is what the hand thinks when the eye has finished.

I touched them anyway.

Still nothing.

The stones kept their counsel.

After Tara we drove to Bective Abbey. An ex-colleague from more than twenty years ago had mentioned it to me, out of nowhere. Strange how these things happen.

Bective was lower, heavier, quieter. A ruin, but still coherent. Sometimes a ruin remembers its purpose better than a living institution.

That was enough.

Tara did not cry out.

Bective did not explain.

The stones kept their counsel.

And I went on.

An Evening in Parliament

There are evenings that feel borrowed from another life.

I left home expecting little more than dinner and conversation, and somehow found myself standing beneath the lamps of the Irish Parliament while chants and drums rolled through the Dublin air outside the gates.

Flags moved in the wind beyond the barriers. Protestors clustered beneath speakers and banners, their voices carrying across the street in waves of anger, rhythm and conviction. Nearby stood two quiet watchers who I instinctively suspected were plain-clothes police, their eyes drifting casually across arrivals and faces while I waited to be invited inside.

Soon afterwards I passed through the security gates, exchanged my name for a temporary badge and crossed quietly into the inner world beyond the barriers.

There is always something slightly surreal about entering places normally reserved for the machinery of the state. As children we see such buildings through television screens and distant ceremony. They exist symbolically long before they ever exist physically.

Yet once inside, symbolism faded quickly.

The first thing that struck me was not power, but humanity.

The old guards at the doors carried themselves with the calm confidence of men who had watched governments rise and fall for decades. Staff members spoke warmly about the building as though it were a living thing they had spent years protecting.

One security man casually quoted Oscar Wilde to me.

“A cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

He had no idea it was already one of my favourite quotations.

That somehow made the moment even better.

Outside, only a short distance away, stands Wilde’s former home. Dublin has a habit of folding history quietly into ordinary conversation when you least expect it.

The deeper into the evening I drifted, the more the atmosphere softened. Formality dissolved into conversation. Politicians spoke openly over drinks, sharing stories not of ideology, but of pressure, campaigns, close calls and moments they had stood their ground when events turned hostile around them.

At one point, a senior political figure moved swiftly through the restaurant with the practiced instinct of someone accustomed to constant movement and constant demands.

And yet even that moment felt strangely human rather than grand.

That was perhaps the strangest thing of all.

Inside the Parliament itself, the surreal quickly became normal.

You shake hands with ministers.
You wander corridors lined with history.
You eat in the restaurant and share drinks in the bar with politicians.
And after a while it simply feels like another gathering of human beings trying to navigate the age they were born into.

There was, at one point, a sense that the night had reached its natural conclusion. I had already wandered the corridors of Parliament, eaten in the restaurant, shared drinks in the bar and stepped back out into the Dublin night.

That alone would have been enough to remember.

Yet life occasionally opens a second door after the first has already closed.

An invitation came almost casually — a suggestion that the night continue elsewhere, this time in a Dublin pub accompanied by three politicians.

And so naturally, I went.

Away from Parliament itself, titles loosened further. The conversations became warmer, funnier and more reflective. Stories emerged not from prepared political language, but from lived experience — campaigns fought, moments of pressure endured, strange encounters, narrow victories and private doubts.

The deeper the evening drifted, the more Ireland itself seemed to reveal its character not through institutions, but through people.

Only later, stepping back out once more into the cool Dublin night, did the unreality begin to settle in properly.

The chants were gone. Dublin carried on around me exactly as before, indifferent to who had passed through which rooms only an hour earlier.

And I found myself thinking how strange life becomes once you begin moving again.

A few years ago my world had narrowed into obligation and repetition. Yet here I was — wandering through parliamentary corridors, listening to old guards dispense quiet truths while politicians traded stories over whiskey and wine deep into the night.

Life does not return all at once.

It arrives in fragments.

Autumn in Odessos.
Christmas Eve in the heat of colonial Georgetown.
A church in Tangier.
A windswept beach at dusk with a metal detector humming softly from finds beneath the sand.
An unexpected invitation.
The sudden opening of a gate.

And one day you realise the current has begun flowing through your world again.

Tangier

Tangier had lived in my imagination long before I ever reached it.

As a boy I used to stare at old British stamps overprinted with a single improbable word: Tangier. Small imperial artefacts from a vanished world. Something about them haunted me. Britain, but not Britain. Europe, but not Europe. A frontier city where the edges of empires touched Africa and then slowly dissolved into dust.

Years later I finally arrived there myself by train from Rabat.

Not into the old city, of course.

Modernity rarely enters through the old gates.

The new station now sits outside the ancient heart of Tangier, functional and detached, while the beautiful old Art Deco station nearer the port survives like a forgotten actor after the audience has gone home. Rail-less now. Disconnected from the line that once carried diplomats, merchants, officers and travellers directly into the old international city. One more elegant relic stranded by time.

Tangier is full of such things.

Ghost structures.

Fragments of abandoned futures.

I stayed inside the Medina, where the old Arab city still breathes beneath the noise of modern Morocco. White walls reflecting afternoon light. Narrow passages winding endlessly downhill towards the sea. The call to prayer floating over rooftops as gulls circled above the Strait.

There are cities which feel built for commerce.

Tangier feels built for memory.

One walks through it with the strange sensation that history never fully departed. It merely withdrew into the walls.

By day I wandered through the old Medina. By evening I walked the Rue d’Italie, absorbing the remnants of the European Tangier that once existed alongside the Arab one. Faded balconies. Colonial façades. Cafés that seemed to belong to another century. Spanish voices still drifting through the streets long after the flags themselves disappeared.

Tangier was once an international city where empires overlapped rather than ruled outright. British, Spanish, French, Arab, Jewish, European and African worlds collided there beside the sea.

And traces of all of them remain.

On Sunday morning I attended service at the old Protestant church built by the British in the early twentieth century.

That hour stayed with me.

Not because of doctrine, but because of continuity.

For a moment it felt possible to step backward through time and glimpse the old British Tangier community exactly as it may once have existed. Merchants in linen suits. Naval officers. Consular staff. Families carrying hymn books through North African sunlight while believing, as all civilisations eventually do, that their presence there might somehow endure.

Afterwards I walked slowly through the church graveyard.

War graves.

Empire builders.

Forgotten surnames carved into weathered stone.

People who once stood confidently at the edge of empire, believing history itself moved in their direction.

Now most lie unvisited beneath palm trees and Atlantic light.

Tangier teaches a hard lesson quietly.

Nothing remains at its height forever.

Not empires.
Not languages.
Not influence.

Not even memory itself.

What fascinated me most was realising how close Tangier came to becoming something else entirely. In many ways the city feels as though it should have become Spanish. Even today Spanish lingers everywhere beneath the surface — in speech, architecture, rhythm and temperament. It remains the city’s second language long after the age that created it has passed.

Yet even that influence now feels impermanent.

Perhaps nowhere more so than in the enormous modernist Spanish cathedral built during the late 1950s. A brutal concrete declaration of permanence. Spain, it seemed, still imagined itself rooted there indefinitely.

But today the building already carries the melancholy of a future that failed to arrive.

That is Tangier.

A city where every civilisation eventually becomes an echo.

Arab.
Spanish.
French.
British.

One layer settling quietly upon another beside the sea.

And perhaps that is why I loved it so much.

Because Tangier does not flatter modern illusions of permanence.

It reminds a man that all power is temporary.
All empires recede.
All railways eventually stop at another station.

Even the ones that once printed their names upon the stamps of the world.

The Room With Two Windows

There was a room in Ireland with two windows.

One looked toward the sea. The other looked toward the road.

Dunwiddie preferred the sea window.

The road window showed delivery vans, dog walkers, Irish weather, the small democracy of other people’s errands. It reminded him of accounts, appointments, forms, banks, proofs of address, mobile numbers, and the long tail of jurisdictions that did not like to be left.

The sea window gave less away. It showed colour, wind, tide, distance. A man could look at it and think in longer lines.

On the table beneath the window were three objects: a Danish letter, a Moroccan train ticket, and a small silver coin blackened by sand.

The letter had been opened twice and answered once. It was written in the flat language of people who believed that language itself created obedience. It referred to deadlines, obligations, processes, and consequences. It had the tone of a schoolmaster addressing a boy who had not yet understood that school was finished.

The train ticket was for Rabat to Tangier. First class. It had cost more than he expected, which irritated him, but the irritation had passed. Prices rose. Doors closed. Seats disappeared. The point was not to get the cheapest ticket. The point was to move.

The coin had no paperwork.

He had found it after a storm, when the shingle had been pulled back like a curtain. At first he thought it was a washer. Then he rubbed one edge with his thumb and saw a faint rim, a suggestion of an old head, something imperial and half-erased.

The coin was the most honest of the three.

That afternoon a woman sent him a message.

She was younger, prettier in photographs than she would likely be in real light, and she had the polished indifference of a woman who had learned that attention could be converted into meals, lifts, compliments, and temporary male confusion.

“Maybe we can meet,” she wrote.

Maybe.

Dunwiddie considered the word.

In investing, maybe was a useful word before entry. It kept a man alert. It meant uncertainty, optionality, conditional sizing. But after entry, maybe became poison. Maybe I should hold. Maybe the discount will narrow further. Maybe she means it. Maybe the country will be fair. Maybe the system will forget. Maybe the woman will soften. Maybe the letter is harmless.

Maybe was where capital went to rot.

He wrote back:

“Tonight at seven, a drink near the station.”

She replied twenty minutes later.

“Let’s see.”

He put the phone face down.

There had been a time when he would have chased the little thread. Not desperately. He was never that crude. He would have been witty, playful, apparently careless. He would have made the uncertainty feel like movement. He would have enjoyed the chemical flicker of the game, and mistaken the flicker for value.

Now he saw the structure.

A woman who wanted to meet made the meeting easy. A market that wanted to rerate did not require prayer. A country that wanted your presence did not trap you in paperwork. A good holding survived examination. A bad one survived only while unexamined.

He poured a bath.

The water ran hot, clouding the mirror. He placed a glass of wine on the edge and lowered himself in slowly. His body, which he had once treated as a machine for enduring obligations, now seemed more like an estate that had finally been returned to its owner.

Outside, the wind rose.

The phone buzzed again on the chair.

He let it buzz.

For ten minutes he thought of nothing except the heat, the steam, and the strange fact that escape was not dramatic once achieved. It was not a trumpet. It was not a speech. It was a set of accounts closed, a number moved, a woman not answered, a train booked, a small refusal repeated until the old structure lost jurisdiction.

After the bath he dried himself and checked the phone.

The younger woman had written:

“Actually I’m tired tonight. Maybe another time.”

He laughed.

Not loudly. Just enough.

Then he deleted the exchange.

He sat by the sea window with the silver coin in his palm. The old monarch’s face was nearly gone, but the metal had endured. It had passed through pockets, wars, marriages, markets, tides, and the hands of men who all imagined their troubles permanent.

On impulse he opened the Danish letter again.

There was a line near the bottom he had missed.

It said that if he did not respond by the stated date, the authority would proceed on the basis of the information available to it.

He looked at the date.

It had passed before the letter arrived.

For a moment the old anger rose. Then something cleaner replaced it.

He took out a pen and wrote across the top:

Received after deadline. No lawful opportunity to respond.

Then he placed the letter in a folder.

Not because the sentence would defeat anything by itself. It might. It might not. That was not the point.

The point was that the paper had been turned from command into evidence.

That was the twist he had been slow to learn.

For years he had believed freedom came from winning the argument. Later he thought it came from leaving the room.

But real freedom came when the same object changed category in his hand.

A woman’s delay became data.

A market’s rise became an exit.

A state’s threat became a file note.

A lost coin became proof that value could survive burial.

He looked once more through the sea window.

The tide was coming in now, covering the dark strip of sand where the coin had been found. By morning, there would be no sign it had ever been exposed.

That was fine.

He had already taken what was his.

« Older posts

© 2026 The Dunwiddie Post

Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑